The great two-timing debate

With any luck, you’ve gotten past the massive personality test, gotten your profile filled out, and persuaded eharmony to start matching you with eligible singles. You come back the next morning and SHAZAM! – you’ve got fifty new matches. And they all want to communicate with you!

OK, most of us are not that popular, but I’m sure anyone who has used eharmony with any level of seriousness has run into this conundrum. How do you deal with communicating with multiple matches, all of whom have the ultimate expectation of being your one-and-only? One thing you can do to reduce the likelihood of this problem is by disabling matching after every batch of matches, but even then you have to deal with a few that may or may not pan out. You want to explore every possible match and not frustrate someone by keeping them waiting, but if there are three matches that all sound like they are The One, it would be pretty aweful to tell Miss B that you’re busy with Miss A, and then have Miss A fall through. Decisions, decisions!

How do you deal with more than one interesting and active match in a way that respects them and benefits you? At what point in the process do you need to make an either-or decision? What do you think?

Do you like this article? Post a comment on Facebook

Comments 4

  1. Scott Grey wrote:

    Becoming “exclusive” before even meeting? That seems kind of unhealthy to me. I communicate with a lot of people. And, although it’s not a conversation topic that I’d usually bring up, I wouldn’t be ashamed to say so.

    In my personal opinion, I’d expect exclusivity when people are at the point where they’d call the other one a “boyfriend” or “girlfriend”.

    So… that’s where I draw the line, personally.

    But if I’m getting so hammered that I can’t respond to people… it’s time to shut off matching until I can. Because stringing them along is rude, IMHO.

    Posted 10 May 2007 at 10:41 am
  2. eharmonyblog wrote:

    all of whom have the ultimate expectation of being your one-and-only?

    My matches didn’t give this impression, and I didn’t, too. My matches and I expected each other to be dating other people. I never felt awful telling one of them, “I’m going out on Friday with someone.”

    If Match A fell through, either (A) I feel it’s part of growing intimate with Match B that I share with B how A and I broke up, or (B) Match B never has to know.

    The key thing about this ‘parade’ exercise — as long as one stays upbeat and optimistic (not depressed and cynical) — one finds love for the right reasons.

    Yep, I’m a two-, three-, four- timer.

    (Elliot/Scott, can you start a post about the new eH feature “Request secure call”?)

    Posted 10 May 2007 at 3:29 pm
  3. Jimbo wrote:

    When I send a message thru e-harmony or someone sends me a message (Must Haves/Can’t Stands), does e-harmony immediately send the messages after they have sent to the person intended or do they control the timing?

    Posted 11 Aug 2010 at 12:06 pm
  4. Jen wrote:

    I agree that it’s silly to be exclusive just because you are talking to someone. I recently had a match tell me he was already communicating with someone and asked if it was okay to get back to me if it didn’t pan out. I said sure, but thought it was silly not to communicate with multiple people. My problem is when I find that I’m really interested in one more than the others that I’m communicating with — then I want to shut down or slow down communication even though I know I should keep possibilities open. Anyone else run into this?

    Posted 15 Aug 2010 at 4:59 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published, shown nor shared.

Your message appears after two to five seconds for the world to see. In case it isn’t obvious, we are not eHarmony. Your message will not be sent to them, and no, we cannot help you with your account.

Have your own topic? Start a new discussion. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting

Geo Visitors Map