Comments on: #eharmony 1 in 500? Check your figures again http://eharmony-blog.com/293 Unofficial, comprehensive and commercial-free guide to eHarmony with news, opinion, discussions and advice Fri, 10 May 2013 23:06:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Computer Algorithms: The Bits and Bytes of Love | Computers & Society http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-151854 Computer Algorithms: The Bits and Bytes of Love | Computers & Society Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:46:42 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-151854 [...] records and success rates for marketing purposes. Eharmony.com itself claims to be responsible for ~ 10 000 marriages. Moreover, online dating services are not as “scientific” as they would have us believe. In [...]

]]>
By: eharmonyblog http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-102826 eharmonyblog Thu, 06 May 2010 05:10:26 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-102826 Mathematician you may need to dust your monitor, sorry. You’re not seeing decimal points on your screen clearly.

]]>
By: mathematician http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-102819 mathematician Thu, 06 May 2010 02:52:21 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-102819 My biggest problem with this article is the fact that you seemed to have failed conversion of decimals to percentages. I’m surprised no one else pointed this out. For instance .0033 DOES NOT equate to 33% rather it equates to .33%. To further illustrate this point .002 is equal to .02%. How hard is this? This is like 3rd grade math. Congratulations.

]]>
By: mathematician http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-102817 mathematician Thu, 06 May 2010 02:50:33 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-102817 My biggest problem with this article is the fact that you seemed to have failed conversion of decimals to percentages. I’m surprised no one else pointed this out. For instance .0033 DOES NOT equate to 33% rather it equates to .33%. This is like 3rd grade math. Congratulations.

]]>
By: Scottk http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-99789 Scottk Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:56:25 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-99789 Dave,
They send matches to people who are already dating someone else, because those people are idiots and didn’t turn off Matching.

]]>
By: dave http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-99776 dave Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:11:48 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-99776 Eharmony is the biggest scam in the dating industry, I had to spam them after they kept sending me matches after I quit eharmony. They do it to everyone and thats why I believe those number are correct, they send matches to people who are already dating someone else.

]]>
By: annoymous1 http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-99768 annoymous1 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:11:26 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-99768 I agree with Dave. I am on Singlenets (haven’t found anyone but at least they don’t make false claims about helping you find the “love of your life”) and I have had no problem with them, however eHarmony was a different story. In spite of all of that, there are customers who are banging to get in their door. Go figure.

]]>
By: pwelborn@embarqmail.com http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-60684 pwelborn@embarqmail.com Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:45:32 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-60684 I need some advice. I am leaving on 12/26/2008 for a trip over seas and will be gone 3 weeks. Is it advisable to turn off matching?

]]>
By: Dave http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-40906 Dave Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:12:38 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-40906 Unless you are one of their few (very few) success stories ehamony throws you under the bus, if you have problems with the service they have people who will talk to you but do nothing. If you are serious about finding somebody don’t send your money to eharmony, it is just a money making machine that will most likely end up hurting you. There are other services that will take you seriously and not treat you like sh*t.

]]>
By: Dave http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-40811 Dave Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:36:16 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-40811 Time hit it right on the mark to name eharmony the #1 web site to advoid. This is nothing but a money making scam with what ever few successes they have they over hype them. I wish I was rejected by them now that I know how contorted their matching system is. It was recommended to me to limit my religous preferances to get more matches? What is up with that? utter despair, Time.

]]>
By: Dave http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-40797 Dave Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:36:51 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-40797 Still no matches, as it has been said before by many others, If you like utter dispair, send your money to eharmony

]]>
By: Dave http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-40605 Dave Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:46:26 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-40605 Eharmony is a over hyped game playing website, they do not listen to their members and are very arrogant thinking that their system is greatest thing there is and cannot fail. I have been victomized by this website and repeatly mismatched to people that are way out of the geografical range (including people that live in another country)that I put in my profile. I am a man who has a fair amount of muscle bulk and very little fat but that makes eharmony think that I am fat and sends me fat women. If I wanted to date fat women all I would have to do is ask them and get plenty of takers, I don’t need to go through all this questions and answers game playing and pay someone for that. So their answer is to give me more free membership time and not send any matches at all. They should be paying me for wasting my time.

]]>
By: Richard Jones http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-3529 Richard Jones Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:24:13 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-3529 Well, that was interesting; the post posted itself before I was finished. Simply another example and testament to the “accurateness” of computers and the internet and how we can misunderstand results, which is where I feel like I am headed with this post.

Regardless, to finish the previous post, some the questions posed to me by this discussion include:

1. How many married people use eHarmony for reasons such as infidelity with or without the intention of leaving their spouse? Lots of people “wing walk” from relationship to relationship and this seems to be the perfect vehicle for that type of activity.

2. How man “divorces” are created by eHarmony by the activity described above? There are three classes of people that can use eHarmony: single, divorced, and married. I’m simply interested in how many marriages were created out of divorces caused by activity on eHarmony and other dating services.

3. How many people post a profile on eHarmony just to punish their spouse or significant other? You man think this is strange, but I know a woman who did that to her husband to simply torment him. Shame on her is about all I can say about that incident. In my opinion, it was cruel.

4. Oh, and how many divorces occur because one spouse or the other found out that the other is using eHarmony to search for whatever their heart desires? You don’t see commercials stating, “Hi, I married Jim, my perfect match, after finding him on this or that dating site, and divorcing my husband!”

Finally, what are the ethics of all of this activity? Obviously one can use such services in an honest and sincere way and possibly meet someone they can have a lasting relationship with, whether it results in marriage or not. Also, the darker side of humanity can arise out of the veil of secrecy offered by the internet and wreak havoc on people’s lives. I am not against these types of services; I believe they offer a valid means of meeting like-minded people, if used correctly, and I consider that a good thing, even a wonderful benefit of technology. However, I can’t help but wonder about the dreams lost and workable relationships that end because of the human desire of greener pastures on the other side. I think I will pass on the opportunity because I believe the bad outweighs the good, otherwise the statistics would reveal more favorable outcomes, right?

Oh, and please excuse any spelling errors in the first post. It is early, and I didn’t have the time to use the “technology” available to “correct” those issues. Come to think of it, maybe those errors were created BY the technology because it leads one to become somewhat lazy and dependant upon it these days. My bad.

]]>
By: Richard Jones http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-3528 Richard Jones Sat, 24 Feb 2007 14:54:26 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-3528 Mountains of numbers and statistical analysis can bolster any argument you desire; it depends on how you collect and present the data to “prove” a preconcieved opinion. This is a common plight in many areas of business, especially advertising. Naturally, people want their “desire” to succeed, whether it be a business or an individual looking for love.

Given those circumstances, there are some questions posed in my mind that can skew the results of all the data collection and constructed reations of success or failure beyond mere data manipulation to prove one’s own desired outcome, such as:

]]>
By: Scott Grey http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-2922 Scott Grey Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:47:53 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-2922 I agree – this statistical analysis is wrong. This wasn’t the strength of the article, though.

I believe that, despite this bogus figure, their paper does touch upon some places where I feel eHarmony is being irresponsible.

They don’t advertise what they REALLY are – a way to meet people that, otherwise, you probably would have never met. Which, in my book, IS a darned good thing, and worth subscribing to.

Instead, they promote themselves as “the best way to meet the love of your life”. To throw away your common sense and humanity, and submit to the computer who knows best who’s right for you.

Fortunately, most people have the sense not to buy into that. But for the socially anxious and vulnerable folks, it can be a recipe for failure, or even abuse. Which is something that this vulnerable population shouldn’t feel blamed for.

]]>
By: Timothy Mahar http://eharmony-blog.com/293/comment-page-1#comment-2867 Timothy Mahar Sun, 04 Feb 2007 01:03:20 +0000 http://eharmony-blog.com/293#comment-2867 According to WeAttract’s report there were 10 million matches and 6 million users? That averages 3.3 matches per user, period. That seems ridiculously low.

http://www.eharmony.com/servlet/press/release?id=49

eHarmony press release dated Aug 22, 2006:

“Six years and 12 million registered users later, more than 90 eHarmony members marry on average every day as a result of being matched on the site.”

“In a recent poll, Harris Interactive indicated that over 33,000 eHarmony members married in a twelve month period ending August 31, 2005.”

That is 33,000 members married in one year. It isn’t stated when these members were matched. They could have been matched six years ago, they could of been matched three months ago. It doesn’t say.

It is easy to get muddled in the numbers. I think the real question is, “What is it worth to you to expand your search for love beyond your social network?”. There is a very large pool of people who are willing to take a long personality test, select some pictures to post, write up a profile and pay good money for the chance to meet someone special.

In the end, I think the people that get the most out of eHarmony are the people that put in the most time and effort.

]]>