“Did I give eHarmony $100 to match me up with a bunch of people that I’ll never be able to talk to?”

(Republished in entirety with permission from johnsmith3487, dated October 7, 2009. Thanks, John!)

Dafearon wrote:

johnsmith3487 wrote,

“I don’t understand why there is so little activity among my matches. … Did I give eHarmony $100 to match me up with a bunch of people that I’ll never be able to talk to?”

Lets look at it from another point of view.

How much are you willing to spend, if you were guaranteed a date? Okay, how about if you were guaranteed a relationship, and then think about guaranteed marriage? Be honest with yourself. How much are these things worth to you?

Second, and this is important. How much is that $100.00 you spent worth to you? If you had that back, what would you do with it instead?

I ask these questions because people need to weigh how much this is worth to them? If they want a quality mate, but they’re not willing to put in the time and energy and, unfortunately, resources, to find it, whats the point?

My point is this. If the $100.00 is life and death for you. Break the bank kind of money, then no, you should not have spent it here because this site is not a sure thing. None of these dating sites are. One should approach EH and any other dating site with a huge grain of salt. If the money you are spending is not worth it to you, then dont’ subscribe. Spend your money elsewhere. But if you can afford this site, or another site, and you’re not really meeting anyone, then give it a shot and see what happens. Worse case scenario, you are in the same position you are at, down a little money, but we’ve already decided you can afford it, so its not a big deal. But if you did meet someone, you’re better off than if you didn’t spend the money.

You just don’t know. This is an avenue to meet people. That is all. Too many people get upset because they’re not getting the perfect match that wants them as soon as they subscribe.

The money is not important. It doesn’t matter what I would do with the $100 if I had it back. What is important is that I’m paying for a service from a company, and I expect that company to treat me with respect.

Imagine walking into your local grocery store to get a gallon of milk. You walk to the back, grab a gallon, and head up front to pay. You walk up to the clerk and he tells you that you can’t just buy that 1 jug, you have to buy 3 months’ worth of milk all upfront. “No big deal, I’m going to have to buy all that milk anyway”, you say to yourself. You agree to the 3-month plan, and you take your milk home to enjoy a hearty dinner of Coco Puffs and Miller Lite. But alas, upon pouring the milk onto your bowl of chocolatey goodness, you find that it’s actually expired! “Oh no!”, you shout, while taking a step back in terror. But there’s nothing on the label to indicate that it’s expired! You sit down for a minute, trying to find a way to deal with the severity of the situation, and thinking this must be some fluke. “Miller Lite without Coco Puffs? No way, it can’t be done!” You run out the door and head back to the store to exchange the milk for a fresh gallon. You tell the clerk what happened, trying not to stare at the little horns growing out of his forehead that you somehow missed before. The clerk responds smirkingly, “No problem, buddy! Just head on back to the milk aisle and grab another jug. There’s a 90% chance that it’s sour, but keep your chin up. If you keep pouring sour milk all over your Puffs, you’ll find that fresh jug eventually!” The devil-clerk laughs at your plight, taunting you with images of people enjoying big bowls of Coco Puffs as you walk back towards the milk aisle.

Do you keep going back to that same grocery store, picking up jug after jug of milk hoping to finally find one that isn’t expired, or do you demand your money back and go to a better store where all the milk is fresh?

I want my money back not so that I will have $100 more, but so that eHarmony will have $100 less. Hell, I would be happy if they just donated $100 to a charity on my behalf. I don’t think eHarmony deserves my $100. I do want to find a good relationship, and I am willing to pay for the service. But if the service doesn’t work, then F them, why should they keep my money?

The only possible reason I can see for eHarmony keeping inactive and unpaid people listed is that they want to boost their membership numbers to look bigger than they really are. Lots of organizations do this, especially organizations that lobby congress. Strength in numbers, woo-hoo! But with those organizations, it really doesn’t matter to the real members if the ranks are full of people who died 10 years ago and free-trial members that never paid dues. On eHarmony, it does directly affect the paying members. It is clearly an issue, as half of the threads on this board are from people who are very annoyed and feel that they have been mislead by eHarmony.

I was so excited to sign up, and now I’m getting more and more disappointed. We’ll see how this next week goes.

Do you like this article? Post a comment on Facebook

Comments 12

  1. Uncle Fester wrote:

    You’re taking posts from eH’s forums now? Wow, that’s lazy of you. I would think you need eH’s permission to do that.

    Posted 28 Oct 2009 at 12:57 pm
  2. SincerelyEthical wrote:

    This is why it’s so important to let people know who is active, who is a subscriber, and who is not.

    Posted 29 Oct 2009 at 12:44 pm
  3. SingleGuyInNC wrote:

    I think it makes you feel worse to see a profile of someone that really strikes you only to never get a response back.

    Not seeing it in the first place would be better in several ways:
    * Focus on the ones that are communicating
    * Less tendency to think about the next match
    * Not be so choosy with the matches that are “live” and close a live match with hopes of a “dead” one responding

    Posted 29 Oct 2009 at 8:39 pm
  4. Kitty11 wrote:

    I don’t get why guys pay their money to date and then never do anything. I’m still waiting for even one to respond to my questions. I’m not being as picky as I once was and am giving more types a chance. When will they?

    Posted 01 Nov 2009 at 3:39 am
  5. Tom wrote:

    Kitty11,

    I could ask the same thing about the ladies, 8 months, 85 matches, I sent off communication to about 70 of those. Of those 10 responded to 1st questions. 7 made it to open communication, 4 made it to phone call, 3 made it to a coffee date. 2 turned into dating, I ditched one and the other ditched me.

    It took me about 4 months before I got my first reply and 6 months before I met someone. This last month seems to have really picked up for some reason as three made it to open communication.

    Posted 01 Nov 2009 at 9:00 am
  6. SingleGuyInNC wrote:

    Kitty11: They are not paying members. Plain and simple. Keep reading through the blog archives, it is not just you…

    Online dating seems to be so low risk that many folks are just “testing the waters” and don’t have any serious intentions of following through. One has to wonder if these folks that don’t close their matches or turn off matching are this wishy-washy or lazy, how they manage to hold onto a relationship in the real world. The flip-side is that they have more than their share of connections in the real world and are just curious and never really intended to communicate…

    Posted 01 Nov 2009 at 10:17 am
  7. SincerelyEthical wrote:

    It is clear that countless of us have felt the frustration, wasted time, and wasted money that comes from not being informed up front about the most basic and vital information about our matches.
    All I can say is, “Behold the power of branding!” People put too much faith in the promises made in commercials, and they stop looking for the really great services that do exist out there… in every type of industry.
    In online matchmaking, it seems that finding a sincere, truly compatible, communicative and serious match is like trying to find a needle in a haystack.
    It seems there’s two choices when it comes to online matchmaking. A person can either get frustrated sorting through tons of carboard cutout “matches” to find a real one, or get frustrated waiting for a “quality match” when none are being made.

    SingleGuy, since RewardingLove is the only place I have found thus far that seems to want to really help people, I think it is the better of the two choices. At least they really seem to be trying to do what they can, and keep members honestly informed to a satisfactory degree. But without the branding to attract the masses, it’s a frustrating free wait.
    Is there any quicker way of finding a great match? Perhaps if I dress a bit more provocatively at church? :)

    Posted 01 Nov 2009 at 11:29 am
  8. SingleGuyInNC wrote:

    Ditto on the “cardboard cutouts”. Ugh. I am SOO tired of seeing the same thing over and over again.

    “Is there any quicker way of finding a great match? Perhaps if I dress a bit more provocatively at church?”

    I am becoming more and more more interested in the offline opportunities that I have missed out for meeting people while I was so busy waiting for matches online. After all, humans did meet and pair off without the internet just a few years ago. :)

    In the meantime, you should be more social. Talk to lots of people. Get the word out that you are interested but not TOO interested (aka the marriage/baby clock ticking). I can filter that out in a prospect and look past it but I suspect it is a turn-off for most men.

    I wouldn’t say you should dress more provocatively, _especially_ at church (well, it depends on how liberal/open-minded your congregation is on average).

    I would say that you should wear something that looks good on you that will turn heads but not risque. A woman can be clothed appropriately to religious standards but easily make a man weak in the knees. However, it is a fine line. The thing to remember is that the killer dress will get a man’s attention but because of the stupid social norms, you are still going to be waiting on him to come over and talk to you.

    I would be all for you to take a deep breath and just be up front and suggest going out with someone that you find interesting. The rest of the women may be shocked, appalled and start calling you names but you will be the one going on dates and likely get your man while they are busy gossiping about you.

    Just my $0.02.

    Posted 01 Nov 2009 at 11:45 am
  9. SincerelyEthical wrote:

    Thank you, SingleGuy. It’s a pleasure to receive a sincere gentleman’s input and perspective. I appreciate your thoughtful words and for taking the time to express them. :)

    For me, the main issue is my lack of consistent free time, and the inability to plan more than a few days in advance. That makes online matchmaking an attractive alternative to good old fashioned social interaction for someone like me. I’m certain many others are in similar situations. It let’s me express the realities of my life in my profile and leaves it up to a potential match to decide if they’re ok with that. I suppose the best thing to do is to continue keeping all options open, so I’m glad to have added to the mix a quality free site like RL which might come through in the long run. A girl can hope! :)

    Posted 01 Nov 2009 at 12:16 pm
  10. Tom wrote:

    SincerlyEhtical, I have the exact same reasons for online matchmaking as you do. My biggest reason for not getting dates with ladies in the “offline world” (and hence the reason I get few matches on Eharmony) is that I do not want kids. In the offline world “kids” is not something you can bring up early on in the dating scene without scaring people off and I don’t feel like wasting time dating people that are not going to be compatible with me on such an impassable subject. Therefore my hope is that things pan out with something in the online world. I am also on RL, and hope that their database grows so that they can start matching.

    Like SingleGuy said, if you are interested in someone, go for it, ask them out to coffee. I don’t know a single guy that would be put off or offended by a lady approaching them.

    Posted 01 Nov 2009 at 1:45 pm
  11. KT wrote:

    Just got hit by my first scammer on eharmony. The frustrating thing is that my membership had lapsed because I got frustrated with the process (if you don’t look like Barbie – don’t expect anyone to want to talk to you).
    Got the email last week that someone wanted to start communicating. By Friday, he had asked me for money and I broke it off immediately. Wasted my time and energy. Going back to letting God be my match maker. I think He’ll do a better job.
    I also really hate their advice on how to “catch a man”. Is that what guys really want – deception, getting caught and then finding out what caught them isn’t the right person. For a Christian company that seems really off. Feeling very ripped off right now.

    Posted 15 May 2011 at 9:50 am
  12. ScottK wrote:

    KT:
    Make *SURE* you report that Match to eHarmony!!!

    You can report the Match to eHarmony by sending an email to:
    matchconcerns@eharmony.com

    You very well may save another user some heartache and a lot of money!

    Posted 17 May 2011 at 7:14 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published, shown nor shared.

Your message appears after two to five seconds for the world to see. In case it isn’t obvious, we are not eHarmony. Your message will not be sent to them, and no, we cannot help you with your account.

Have your own topic? Start a new discussion. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting

Geo Visitors Map