eHarmony Review, by TRG

(Republished in entirety with permission from reader The Rant Guy (homepage), dated 12 August 2009, updated 23 August 2009. Thanks, Alexander!

There are lots of online dating sites out there to choose from. There are niches (geeks, jocks, rich), unlimited contact (match.com), pay per contact (lavalife) and then there is the worst possible choice you can make.

eHarmony.

(please note, I am writing a book on the subject and have interviewed hundreds of people who have used every major service and/or modern method of meeting people. While I use my own personal experiences in this article, they reflect the majority view of those who I have interviewed over the course of the last five years)

Now, I don’t want to talk too much about the founder (Christian fundamentalist) or his views on gay/lesbian relationships (i.e. not accomodated for on the site) or even the site’s outright rejection of people based on your survey results* (generally believed to be due to indications of depression) but rather the other prevalent reasons why eharmony is almost guaranteed to leave you poorer, discouraged and heading elsewhere.

*Seriously, you can fill out your personality survey and be told that, in effect, they can’t match you and don’t want you as a client.

1. It’s expensive.

(Prices used will be different depending on your native currency)

At $60 a month (cheaper if you commit to multiple months) it is almost twice as expensive as match.com or lavalife (the two biggest options on the internet). That doesn’t include its ridiculous “ID Verification” service ($6 a month), Secure call ($6 a month) or Premium personality profile ($10)

I have yet to ever meet, talk to or interview anyone who ever felt they needed anonymous calling (since no reverse address lookup on cell phones exists, number blocking is available on landlines), or felt they needed to have the id of the person they were talking to verified (if you are that uncomfortable with somebody that the idea of going to a public place to meet for coffee is terrifying, a verified id isn’t going to help and that person probably isn’t the right one for you anyway) or found that the already deep profiles out there, weren’t enough.

So, you can spend $82 in your first month on the system. $82!!

2. It’s “matching” system is garbage.

“Our matching criteria, based on the 29 dimensions of compatibility, are extremely strict, and are what makes eHarmony a unique and powerful tool in finding your soul mate.”

Even though I went through eHarmony’s process once before (one month, where I had a single date that was top five worst of my life) and have interviewed dozens of former users of the site, I decided to go through it once more for this article.

At the end of my paid month… I was matched with 212 women. Now, think about that for a second. That’s more than 7 women a day who are, apparently, so compatible with me that we’d make a great pair.

210 of those matches were closed (by me or them) before uttering a single typed word between us. That’s a 99% failure rate before we’ve even said hello.

I exchanged a grand total of eight emails with my remaining two matches before both simply never responded to my last email.

So, for $60 I had two brief conversations, no phone calls, and no dates. If you add in my previous experience, that’s $120 to go on one miserable date.

Given that I have, personally, had success on other systems (i.e. I am not an un-date-able monster) and date relatively frequently, it quite simply boggles the mind to get results that abysmal.

If you randomly chose 212 women who were in my age range and lived within 10 miles of me, what are the odds that the success rate wouldn’t be better than eHarmony’s matching process? If I talked to 3 women from that random group, I’d be ahead.

In fact, it’s almost as if, in order to keep you paying monthly, the system purposely matches you with people you don’t want to date.

3. Match Characteristics

Distance

In order to fluff up their match numbers, eharmony’s smallest distance matching criteria is 30 miles or 50 kilometers. In other words, you can’t ask the system to match you with people within 10 miles.

Lavalife, for example, can match down to 10 miles.

This results in about 30% of my matches being closed outright over distances. Can you imagine living in the center of New York or Boston and dating somebody who lived 30 miles away? Where I live, that’s a different city.

Height

eHarmony puts height as a “like to have” and then utterly ignores anything resembling common sense. I routinely get matches 2-3 inches taller than I am.

Women overwhelmingly prefer men who are older/taller. A woman 3 inches taller is going to be 5-6 inches taller in heels.

Every other dating site allows you to put in a height preference and actually listens to you!

Age

Again, more fluffing of matches. eHarmony forces a six year age range for matching and also warns you against not including your own age in the range.

I do not necessarily disagree with the notion of a six year age range, but why not give users the choice?

4. Conspicuous lack of info

Want to know whether any of your matches are active or not? eHarmony isn’t going to tell you! Every other site either states it openly on each profile or sorts results by activity (i.e. the most recently active person at the top of the list).

eHarmony hides this information to provide the illusion of more matches. They don’t respond because they signed up, logged off and never logged on again.*

*Admittedly all the dating sites keep these profiles online because it allows them to state X million members in advertising. However, unlike eHarmony, you’ll never see them on other sites because they would be so far down your search results that you’d never get that far.

5. Dual pay

So, you spend 45 minutes going through the survey, you fill in your profile, you’ve mortgaged your house for a month’s membership, go through your matches (closing 90% because they are clearly unsuitable), and finally see a couple of people who you might actually want to have a chat with.

Well, they gotta pay too.

Every other major system allows for one member to pay to contact the other and, then, free contact between you. On lavalife, for example, men buy the vast (vast) majority of contact credits.

However, on eHarmony, your already small number of matches are guaranteed to get even smaller when you realize that most of the people you’d like to respond to, can’t because they haven’t paid themselves.

6. Daily matching

I can’t confirm this, but I believe that eHarmony’s matching process is somehow staggered.

In both personal experience and through my interviews, pretty much everybody reported a lot of “pursuing another relationship”‘s as a reason for receiving a closed match. Now, that might make sense on your 1st day (when, in theory, you’d be matched against everyone in the database) but why would it happen on your 6th day? On your 6th day you should be matched with only those people who joined in the last 24 hours, so nobody should be anything other than a brand new member.

As well, I have reports of people (myself included) receiving a lot of matches 2-3 days before their paid membership expires (as an inducement to get you to sign up again).

7. Matches on their time, not yours!

Let’s say you get up early, load up your profile, go through your matches and then head off to work. After a long day at work, you head out for a beer with your friends, you finally get home and decide to log in again and see what new matches you might have.

On every other site, you’d be able to search for people that joined that evening. On eHarmony they are going to match you when they are good and ready.

You see, they process their matches once a day (sometime after midnight). Period.

Now, I don’t think it’s healthy to obsessively log in to dating sites, I don’t think you should be running a dozen searches a day. However, why is it eHarmony’s job to decide that you can’t do that?

If every other site can process a new profile in all of twelve seconds (although, in fairness, your profile description may take a day to be approved, but often photos and basic info can be up inside ten minutes) then why can’t eHarmony?

Matching once daily (and only once daily) is just another example of eHarmony deciding what’s best for you.

8. Insulting your intelligence / stringing you along.

One of their banner ads states “Get up to 20% more matches by expanding your distance setting to 120 miles or more”.

Perhaps this isn’t an insult to your intelligence, but it’s absurd nonetheless. 120 miles is a 2-4 hour round trip (2 hrs is 120 mph). That’s a tremendous distance to go for a coffee with somebody.

You could undoubtedly get more matches by including the entire world but it’s not practical (or wise). Relationships in 2009 are hard enough without having to buy a tank of gas and plan for hours of driving every time you want to get together.

Which leads us to eHarmony’s “have patience” doctrine. Hmmm, a website that bills monthly extolling the virtues of being patient. I wonder whose interest that serves?

As far as I am concerned, if you plan on spending six months on a single dating site, you’ve picked the wrong strategy.

9. Quitting

Leaving eHarmony is like dumping a needy girlfriend, it’s messy and goes on far longer than it should.

Canceling your profile requires going through at least four cancellation pages, providing reasons (and on and on) as to why you’d ever consider leaving.

Look, people move on, and a site should let you do so with a minimum of fuss (as every other site I have ever researched does).

Summary

So… you’ve got a website that will exclude you based on sexual preference (if you are not heterosexual) or depression… that’s the most expensive on the internet… that ignores your matching requirements or prevents you from narrowing by things like distance… and generally does things in a way that ensures you will talk to less people than on any other service over a given time period (which means fewer dates and less likelihood of ever meeting anybody great).

If you like unlimited contact, head to match.com… if you want pay per use, go to lavalife.com… and if you want free, go to plentyoffish.com… none of them are perfect, but all a damn sight better than eHarmony.

Addendum

Every day, I’d log in to the system to get my “matches” and then close pretty much all of them and log out. Except that I began to notice something really strange. I was getting the same number of matches every day.

If you designed a system with strict standards, as eHarmony says, why on earth would you get the exact same number of matches on a daily basis?

In my last 30 days on the system here is my match data:

5 matches or less – 0
6 matches – 1 (3%)
7 matches – 26 (87%)
8 matches – 3 (10%)
9 matches or more – 0

So, every 9 out of 10 days there are exactly 7 super compatible women for me?

There are two explanations.

1. There are 7 super compatible women for me every day (given that my month on the system featured two email conversations and no dates, that would seem to be… doubtful)

2. eHarmony’s algorithm just tosses 6-8 people your way every day to keep you paying your monthly fee.

Do you like this article? Post a comment on Facebook

What others are reading right now

    Comments 8

    1. SincerelyEthical wrote:

      I must agree with you. Although eHarmony’s concept is great in theory, many of their business practices sabotage what could be a great service.
      The main problem comes down to a lack of business ethics. Simply stated, people would appreciate the ugly truth more than the illusions depicted in their advertising. For example, knowing upfront whether a match is actively participating on the site or whether they only took the questionnaire during a ‘free communication weekend’ and then never returned, would be extremely helpful. Customer service is clearly not their #1 concern if they don’t provide us with this time-saving and money-saving information. People’s time is very valuable, and they do us all a large disservice by having us all waste our time on wild goose chases.
      It’s quite obvious that this is done to pad the membership numbers and to Sell Advertising. Have you seen the “advertise on eHarmony” document? It makes me feel like just a number… which I am to them.
      Also, who in the world has ever deemed eharmony “America’s most trusted relationship site”?? Just because they say so? I’m going to try that… “I am the Queen of England” Poof… Oh, nothing happened… maybe because it’s Not True! Advertising is such a powerful tool, and it is amazing how easily people can be persuaded to believe something they are told, if they are told often enough.
      I place most of the blame on the puppetmasters who are likely making all of these customer-enraging business decisions for eHarmony. I’m talking about the three major shareholders who have provided venture capital to eHarmony. They are listed on the site via the “eHarmony Shareholders” link. Obviously we have no way of knowing how much control they have, but they likely own the lion’s share of the business. Therefore, they likely call the shots when it comes to subjecting members to an increasing amount of advertising, and creating the illusion of 20+ million members, when only about 1 or 2 million are actual paid subscribers who can communicate with you if matched together.
      Personally, I believe eHarmony would be much better off just telling people the truth, delivering fewer matches, and making sure those matches are subscribers. Sure, they would lose a lot of money they are currently making on advertising if they used the actual subscriber numbers (1 or 2 million) rather than the illusory 20 million, but at least it might justify their high price point to a degree, and provide some much needed integrity. But if they don’t think it’s broken, they surely won’t fix it, so we’ll see what happens. All I know for sure is this: Most people appreciate the truth; I know I do. They should try it and see what happens :)

      Posted 15 Aug 2009 at 3:34 pm
    2. eharmonyblog wrote:

      eHarmony topped a certain nationwide brand trust/awareness survey circa 2005 but sorry I can’t find a link to it right now. That’s why they dubbed themselves “#1 Trusted”. I’ll post the link once I find it.

      Don’t online advertisers look at things such as unique visitors per month and impressions per month? So whether they say 2 million or 20 million or 200 million members their ad rates don’t go up.

      Posted 16 Aug 2009 at 1:03 am
    3. Ron wrote:

      TRG,

      At the risk of someone here calling me a shill:

      1. Expensive
      As anyone who joined eHarmony knows, nobody is buying relyid, secure call and the preimum profile. As anyone who joined eHarmony soon finds out, the regular price is really $20/mo, the same as other sites. It’d have been more useful to your readers that you mention these.

      2. “175 of those matches were closed (by me or them)”
      The fact that you or they closed them immediately is no proof that you would never have made a great pair. What is likely happening is that you and your matches are relying on first impressions, physical appearances or worse, prejudice.

      Also, out of every 177 members that came out when you ran a search on another dating site, how many of them did you, again relying on first impressions, decided to contact and whom decided to reply?

      3. Match Characteristics
      What does distance, height and lack-of-short-age-range have to do with compatibility? Again I suspect you and your matches are relying on first impressions, physical appearances or worse, prejudice.

      4. Lack of info
      I agree.

      5. “Every other major system allows for one member to pay to contact the other.”
      This isn’t true. Among the big ones, only lavalife isn’t dual pay.

      6. “pretty much everybody reported a lot of “pursuing another relationship”’s as a reason for receiving a closed match.”
      So it IS working, eh, just not to you and your interviewees. No you are not matched against everyone in the database on your 1st day. Otherwise you would have received far more matches on Day 1 than on Day 10 than on Day 100. The fact is that it sends you only up to 5-8 matches a day.

      7. Quitting
      I agree. A minor point on the flipside though: the more members are persuaded to stick, the more members you will be matched with.

      There you go, you can call me a shill now.

      Posted 17 Aug 2009 at 9:15 pm
    4. The Rant Guy wrote:

      Ron,

      Happy to respond.

      1 – Joining for a single month is $60. Nobody should have to sign up for six months to get a $20 a month rate.

      2/3 – Will combine these. While distance may not technically have an impact on compatibility, what good does it do the average user to be super-compatible with a woman who lives in Japan if you are in Ohio?

      Ignoring height is also kinda silly (you have to admit), you really believe that the 6′ women I am matched with really want to date a guy who is 5’8? She’s a half a foot taller than me in heels.

      We both know that the percentage of marriages where the guy is shorter is quite small.

      5 – Sorry, I have joined udate, friendfinder, rsvp, ok cupid, plentyoffish, match, lavalife, jdate and a half dozen more and every single one allows you to receive an email from a paid member. Feel free to email me the list of “major” sites where it’s dual pay.

      6 – I have interviewed like a hundred people who have been on eHarmony. In fact, I got this email ten minutes ago (seriously) “I did manage to take a quick break to look at your ranting. Loved the one about eHarmony! SOOOO TRUE! I may just have to become a fan on FB! ;) ” – When 0/100 like something, that says there is a pattern to me.

      Does eHarmony have members who have gotten married, absolutely. The real question is, how many have failed to meet anybody.

      Besides, if these people are actually pursuing a relationship, why haven’t they taken down their profile? How do you know they met their beau on eHarmony?

      As well, why wouldn’t I be matched against everyone in the database? If eHarmony cared about making users happy, it would match you against everyone and then you’d have a tonne of matches every day. They dribble them out so you stay on the system longer (and pay them more)

      If you join Lavalife (or any other site), you get to choose. eHarmony decides they know better.

      Look – if you like the system, great, I am not here to irrationally bash anybody. My book (almost finished) was compiled on the experience of almost a thousand interviews with people who have used a variety of sites and means to try to meet a good partner.

      eHarmony was the only site where I was unable to find a single person who was happy with their service and liked them. If somebody off this site wants to contact me and tell me how they met their match, I am happy to take note of their experiences.

      Until then, I stand by what I have written. Eharmony is the single worst (of anything resembling any size) dating site on the ‘net.

      Posted 28 Aug 2009 at 1:23 am
    5. The Rant Guy wrote:

      I’ll respond to these as well, if you don’t mind.

      eHarmony topped a certain nationwide brand trust/awareness survey circa 2005 but sorry I can’t find a link to it right now. That’s why they dubbed themselves “#1 Trusted”. I’ll post the link once I find it.

      Would love to see the methodology (I have a Masters and am an expert on survey’s…most of them are crap lol)…but it’s almost 2010…what happened to “most trusted” in 2006/7/8 and 9?

      Not that I’d trust any site trumpeting any stat like that. All you need to do is run a survey and keep doing it until you get the results you want. (survey companies are notorious for arranging results favorable to the people that hired them)

      Don’t online advertisers look at things such as unique visitors per month and impressions per month? So whether they say 2 million or 20 million or 200 million members their ad rates don’t go up.

      The number of members is designed to appeal to new subscribers not advertisers. You are correct, an advertiser would get unique views. A love looker wants a big site with lots of members, it’s why no dating site ever purges any accounts. So they can advertise X number of profiles.

      Posted 28 Aug 2009 at 1:29 am
    6. SometingMore78 wrote:

      I felt compelled to write you a letter. Last year I became single for the first time in years. As we all know becoming single is a tough experience but in my case was a little more uncomfortable. You see I had been in a relationship since I was 15. So after 15 years out of the dating scene I was totally and completely lost. Where to meet single eligible guys? I learned the hard way that business and pleasure don’t mix, meeting someone at the grocery/liquor/harware store seemes insane, picking up randoms at bars seems kind of wrong to me and all of the men in my yoga class are more interested in my male instructor LOL So what does one do? I logged onto the only dating site I knew of… Plenty of Fish. After parusing some of the profiles and finding not just one but multiple team members from where I work decided that one wasn’t for me. I then found OK Cupid where I created a profile and had some fun with the games. I received what i believe to be a normal or standard amount of responses and went on a few dates. Ok more than a few… And after having what I truly believe to be the worst date ever in the history of al first dates I realized that I just couldn’t find what I was looking for. Most of the men on the site said that they were interested in a long term relationship but in all honesty they weren’t and I was definitly ready to give up on the whole dating thing for good LOL. Almost there but not quite I filled out the eharmony profile. My first month on the eharmony site was not good… matches that were far too short ( I am the 5 ft 11 inch woman you spoke of earlier LOL), personality wise my matches seemed great but looks wise not so much… call me shallow but thats important to me. So ready to give up again I canceled my membership. Then at Christmas time one of those happy fuzzy warm eharmony commercials came on the TV promising to find the love of my life as I was sitting alone on Christmas Eve and I could get 3 months for the price of one. So I thought wha the hell and gave it one more shot. This time was much better and I went on some really great dates and was making some great connections that could turn into something more. I have always said that I would rather be single than settle and when I met my meant to be I would know it. Although I met some great guys, successful, smart and good looking who were searching for the same things as me I just wasn’t feeling the tug at my heart with any one of them as I hoped I would. Then it happened , I met him through eharmony after I decided to be completely myself and not just the me that I wanted to protray. My boyfriend and I met through the eharmony matching process. We are very compatible in many many ways, we are both searching for the same things and are very very happy. It took me alot of digging through many different profiles and going on horrible dates before I found him but I did. So although it may not work for everyone, eharmony worked for us. I hope this helps give another side to your book. Oh and I had no problem closing my eharmony account. Take care, enjoy life and remember everything happens as it should:)

      Posted 01 Sep 2009 at 6:25 pm
    7. Ron wrote:

      1. Right. As anyone who joined eHarmony soon finds out, the regular price is $20/month. Only the uninitiated pay over $30 for their first month. It’d have been more useful to your readers that you mention, “Members typically pay $20 a month for 3 months through email offers or through promotional codes that are easy to find.”

      2. “If you randomly chose 212 women who were in my age range and lived within 10 miles of me, what are the odds that the success rate wouldn’t be better than eHarmony’s matching process?”

      In my experience, around 1 in 1 odds.

      The fact that you or they closed them immediately is no proof that you would never have made a great pair. If I paraded 212 women in front of you, based on what you said you did in eHarmony, I bet you will also shut them out immediately relying on first impressions, physical appearances, or worse, prejudice.

      Thus, 1 in 1 odds.

      Here’s what I dare you prove me wrong — Go to eHarmony, contact all X # of women sincerely. Go to Dating Site B, contact all X # of women sincerely. Go out on the real world, contact X # of random women sincerely. I bet the success rate that someone agrees to go out with you is around the same on all three.

      5. It took me a while to get back to you with this one:

      udate – no
      friendfinder – yes
      rsvp – no
      okcupid – free site, doesn’t count
      plentyoffish – free site, doesn’t count
      match – no
      lavalife – yes
      jdate – no

      Only lavalife and friendfinder isn’t dual pay. Friendfinder isn’t major, in my opinion. What else do you have?

      6/7. “As well, why wouldn’t I be matched against everyone in the database?”

      This topic is a good one. It’s a divisive issue.

      The daily match limit will be frustrating to those who are used to the ‘search-browse-contact’ model of other sites. Elsewhere in this blog, someone said that (any of) eHarmony’s success is due to this throttling.

      As for me, I personally like the throttling. Women don’t get 20 emails a day, which they then ignore. Each guy is deliberated more carefully.

      “…generally does things in a way that ensures you will talk to less people than on any other service over a given time period”

      So on the flipside: This ensures that the women I contact are also talking to less people than on any other service.

      She isn’t inundated with choices.

      Hey, one more thing, TRG — eHarmony’s 60-40 women-to-men ratio. Isn’t this an advantage to at least someone?

      Posted 23 Sep 2009 at 10:51 am
    8. you wrote:

      So this is Allison:

      Allison

      She is 26 years old and lives in downtown Minneapolis. She likes to drink.

      Her cell number is 952.818.4015. Honest to god that is the cell number of Allison the girl in the picture above. Call her and tell her you met her at a bar.

      Posted 10 Oct 2009 at 10:53 am

    Post a Comment

    Your email is never published, shown nor shared.

    Your message appears after two to five seconds for the world to see. In case it isn’t obvious, we are not eHarmony. Your message will not be sent to them, and no, we cannot help you with your account.

    Have your own topic? Start a new discussion. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Subscribe without commenting

    website statisticsGeo Visitors MapFacebook Re-lint Me!