Your question answered: Why eHarmony rejected you

A search for the phrase “eHarmony is based upon a complex matching system” (an excerpt of eHarmony’s rejection notice) in Technorati, a blog search engine, gives 50 hits in the last 45 days — This means that, once a day, someone is blogging that eH rejected them — that they flunked a personality test. At the same time, searching for “eHarmony reject” in Google gives 39,000 hits.

There really is something irksome about being promised “someone who will love you for who you are” and then getting a boilerplate rejection notice.

“Unable to match you at this time” — so what does this mean?

What irritates us about the boilerplate reason, which has been unchanged since 2000 when eH launched, is that it loves to be vague. We at eHarmony Blog hate vagueness, so, for you, we did some research.

Here is the most complete checklist of reasons why eHarmony rejected you:

Reason #1. You said you are separated or married on page 1. 30% of eHarmony rejects fall into this category, according to a May 2007 article in the Washington Post.

Reason #2. You said you are below 20 on page 1. 27% percent fall into this category.

Reason #3. You said you were married more than twice on page 1.1 “EHarmony also rejects anyone younger than 60 who’s been married more than four times,” according to the Washington Post article.

The cursed test still lets you go through all questions even if it knows on page 1 that it will reject you. And, look, it even has the irony to say, “If we find that we will not be able to match a user using these profiles, we feel it is only fair to inform them early in the process.”

Reason #4. Your answers don’t tally, i.e., (a) you clicked randomly or (b) for example, you put “1″ under Aloof on page 1, but checked “Outgoing” on page 6. 9% of rejects fall into this category.

Reason #5. You scored low on the following traits — eHarmony calls them dimensions:

  • Self-Concept (how you perceive yourself)
  • Emotional Status (feeling happy, fulfilled and hopeful)
  • Character (honesty and trustworthiness)
  • Obstreperousness (the black hole dimension)
  • Character (honesty and trustworthiness)2
  • Emotion Management: Anger (expressing negative emotions constructively)
  • Conflict Resolution (resolving issues).
  • Family Background (happy childhood and supportiveness of your parents)

If you remember, there are entire SECTIONS in the test exactly to ask if you have ill feelings in the last month, how you handle arguments and how good your relationship is with your parents. If a registrant just left an abusive relationship and she revealed her feelings in the test, well, instead of saying, “Sorry but you’re not emotionally ready to get married. We’d like to tell you what you need to work on, but we’re not your therapist,” eH rejects the registrant.

So what do I do next?

We want to tell you to open another yahoo or hotmail account today and retake the test, but we can’t. Instead we offer a gentle suggestion. May we suggest that you take a break first from seeking committed relationships. We mean, enjoy being single again (or for now).

[added after RG's comment below] Or we could be wrong. It’s possible that eHarmony is not for you. There’s nothing wrong with you; it’s just that the eH system was designed for a certain profile of people and match them for marriage — it isn’t ready for someone like you yet.

DO NOT read this as a judgement that there is no one out there for you. You know best what is best for you. DO NOT let the above generalisations discourage you from desiring and working towards a lifetime loving commitment with another person. If the above reasons do not apply, then we invite you to retake the test, now or after a few weeks or months. [/added]

Without sounding “holier than thou”, try this idea for size: If you’ve joined an matrimonial matchmaking site, would you want matches who are emotionally ready to be married? Would you like to be matched to someone who reveals psychological or emotional problems?

What do you think?

Check out our May 2007 poll: Do you agree with eHarmony rejecting people?

Do you like this article? Post a comment on Facebook

Trackbacks & Pingbacks 4

  1. From The 29 Dimensions of Bunk: Part 2 – A Skeptic was Rejected « Gotham Skeptic on 26 Mar 2010 at 4:06 am

    [...] for rejection are varied. A general list of such reasons include  testing low in self-concept, emotional status (happiness), character [...]

  2. From eHarmony failure - PriusChat Forums on 30 Jun 2010 at 8:57 am

    [...] Re: eHarmony failure eHarmony is famous for rejecting people (especially if you hint at being a little sad on the questionnaire). Only annoyingly-obliviously happy people need apply. For what it's worth, there are other reasons here: Your question answered: Why eHarmony rejected you • eHarmony Blog [...]

  3. From But you might soil yourself from all the excitement « Phantom Mattress on 11 Apr 2011 at 3:18 pm

    [...] in addition to discouraging gays and lesbians, atheists, depression sufferers and the divorced, eHarm also advises women that it’s possible to be too independent. You could be sabotaging [...]

  4. From “Guess what? I have flaws.” | She Sings at the Table on 14 Jun 2011 at 7:13 pm

    [...] on eHarmony and they told me I was un-matchable. (Really! Some follow-up googling revealed this interesting explanation. [...]

Comments 124

  1. Rob wrote:

    Why are you so angry Scottk? In fact, why should this matter you you at all if you are such a happy eHarmony customer? Did something in my post hit a little too close to home? It matters to me because it fundamentally un-American.

    People like you might have said the same things to blacks under segregation – why do you care if you can’t go in that restaurant – there are plenty of restaurants where blacks can go. It matters to me because the company is a fraud. They conned 40 million Americans into taking an hour long test of hundreds of highly personal questions, then rejected them for being honest. Their founder, hawked this test as “a forty dollar value” and this said they reject people they don’t consider to be “emotionally healthy”. By my calculation, they should pay this forty million dollars back to those people.

    I assume you are a Christian and that is why you are so angry at what I said, but I don’t have anything against Christians- I just don’t like bigots, or the people who support them.

    BTW, I don’t think you are telling the truth when you say “I know of 1 person that absolutely, positively, stated he was an Atheist when he joined, and answered every religion question that came up with that same answer”. That’s right, I think you are lying. Why would your friend tell you that? Did he know in advance you were going to participate in this discussion thread? What nonsense – you just happened to be discussing eHarmony’s treatment of Atheists. People are smarter then you give them credit for dude.

    The one thing we DO know about eHarmony’s algorithm is that it screens out honest people. People who tell the truth on that survey get rejected, while many people who lie get accepted. For this reason, I think eHarmony is PERFECT for you. I’m sorry this post that had nothing to do with you you made you so angry. I obviously hit a nerve.

    Posted 23 Jan 2010 at 11:02 pm
  2. annoymous1 wrote:

    I agree about them conning people. After I was abruptly bump, I got recently an invitation with the same hype to take their personality test again. The problem is they are so big and fragmented the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing. I am too smart to be taken in again by them. Had I been stupid enough to do that, I would have run into the same land mine I walk on before. Sorry, that is just the way it is. I might say also all this attempts at name calling is just a way to silence a different opinion that might make some people uncomfortable or mad. I am sorry, as an everyday person, I really am a shy person who does not like conflict. However, after so many years of keeping my peace as I get older, I realize that doesn’t work. And so it goes.

    Posted 25 Jan 2010 at 9:12 am
  3. annoymous1 wrote:

    Don’t agree with either of you on various point. There are 2 categories I saw when it comes to religious, spiritual but not religious, and neither spiritiual or religiious. The later probably in some people’s mind falls under atheist or agnostic. I had some matches who were the later. I really don’t think eHarmony cares about how spiritual or religious you are. I think they are looking more at a person’s life style and whether they can pass their personality tests. And people who obviously are robotic without emotional or personal problems. Which probablay rules out more than 50 percent or higher of the populatioin. These tests are unfair in my view because they don’t know the individual and what they are doing to work out their problems if they have them. Having that I will say this it matter, how they treat people but they do not have a curve on all the knowledge no body does.
    Eleanor Roosevelt said “no one can make you feel inferior without your consent.” I also think income matters, I saw very few everyday working stiffs like me if there were some I would have like to have been matched up with them. So maybe the importance we give eHarmony is the power they have over us. Irvonically my debating this add fuel to the fire. And so it goes.

    Posted 25 Jan 2010 at 1:49 pm
  4. Peter wrote:

    Well it’s actually pretty confusing now. I joined eHarmony a while back and answered all of the questions honestly and was “rejected”. I joined again the other day using the same name but a new email address obviously and used all of the same details and answered all of the questions with the same answers as before. This time I was accepted. Both times I stated honestly that I am an atheist. Go figure! Maybe the algorithm gets moody.

    Posted 26 Jan 2010 at 3:47 am
  5. annomous1 wrote:

    Perhaps you anwer some of the questions differently. Again, I really do not think they care how religious you are. And these tests are not infallible..

    Posted 26 Jan 2010 at 5:08 am
  6. annoymous1 wrote:

    Peter now that you are in, I hope that they let you stay if that is what you want. And I hope it is worth it. Stay under their radar.

    Posted 26 Jan 2010 at 6:54 am
  7. Jon wrote:

    LOL this cracks me up. I posted to this blog like two years ago and that Rob guy is still ranting about this. Too funny. He’s probably spent 10 hours ranting about his lost 1 hour that’s worth so much money.

    Anyway, if you got the dreaded EH rejection I wouldn’t worry about it. From my experience and some of the conversations I had with several dates, the service sucked. They trickle matches to you to keep you paying and I had very little in common with the matches. The success/failure rate is no better than a bar or any of the free personals out there.

    I used it for 11 months at something like 50 bucks a month. So, most of you actually dodged a bullet. I’m out over 500 bucks!

    I dated one girl for seven months and looking back I can honestly say it was because she was hot. Nice girl but not much personality, very standoffish, etc.

    You know what the hook was to get her to go out with me? I told her I was quitting EH because it sucked and she could email me outside of EH if she wanted to keep chatting. Our first conversation was basically, “yeah, EH sucks.” “They match me with middle-aged bald guys with beer guts.”

    Dated another girl who was nice and normal, but in the end I simply wasn’t very attracted to her. I hope she found someone nice though.

    Most of the girls I met on there were pretty terrible, actually. They were husband shopping and if you weren’t looking for a wife they weren’t looking at you. Dates felt like job interviews. And many of them had ZERO personality, no sense of humor, and were pretty plain looking, etc. Just awful, awful dates. Of course, there were a fair number of good ones that just sort of fizzled, but I’d say maybe one in four.

    I’m atheist and said so. I also dated one girl who said she was a witch! Don’t know if she said so or not on her questionaire…

    I also dated women of all income levels. I don’t think that was a factor. A couple were just too damn broke, in fact. One just leased a car but was being evicted for not paying rent. Um… and you’re dropping 50/mo on a dating service? Psycho killer….

    Ah… eharmony. Good times.

    Posted 26 Jan 2010 at 7:53 pm
  8. annomous1 wrote:

    Well you don’t sound much different from some of the reveiws on BBB and other web sites. Just the same customers are knocking down the door to get in. Strange contradiction and they are still standing at least for now.

    Posted 26 Jan 2010 at 8:18 pm
  9. Rob wrote:

    So, it is a dishonest company- I have every right to tell people about it for as long as I want. If a few people see these posts and don’t get ripped off by them, then that is a good thing. If there was a restaurant chain that didn’t let certain a certain race of people in I would have the right to express myself on that as well.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if their algorithm has changed as the result of criticism. People used to be quite adamant that they were eliminated for political reasons – and I believe them. Now, however, they advertise on left leaning media like MSNBC and the former Air America. I doubt if they still actually screen out “Atheists” or “Liberals” – but I am quite certain their is a right wing bias in their matching, but what they really want is your money.

    Sounds like you were on the site for a good long time. They extract more money from each member than any other service – more than $300 believe. They don’t really want you to be matched with anyone – then you will stop paying. How much did they sucker you out of? Why would you like it better then something like say – PlentyofFish where you can communicate directly. They have a psychological test if you want to be matched that way, and they even have a “want to get married” section now.

    I understand Neil Clark Warren has been ushered out the door there – or at least they have taken his creepy commercials off the air, but the culture of dishonesty he started lives on there. You can see it in things like “free communication weekend”. Doesn’t that more or less destroy their base assumption that you need “a daddy” before you are allowed to talk to each other. Please don’t support this company.

    Posted 26 Jan 2010 at 8:47 pm
  10. annoymous1 wrote:

    In all honesty Jon, “Me think the gentlemen protests too much.” You didn’t have that bad a time. I wouldn’t be surprise if I someday you paid to get back in. In addition, to wondering why people were rejected I wonder why they are accepted. I think you are out for a good time. And that is what I saw again and again when I was there. Men who just wanted a pretty thing to have a fling with. This goes counter supposedly to eHarmony so called value system. If they screen out people why don’t theyt find a way to screen out matches who aren’t serious about having a relationship. Anyway, I am not sure you really believe that it wasnt worth it. So customers who are rejected have a right to their feelings. I suppose they don’t screen out play boys because they wouldn’t have any customers. And so it goes.

    Posted 27 Jan 2010 at 7:20 am
  11. annoymous1 wrote:

    As for Dr. Warren, it is interesting he sent me a message when they were trying to recruit me saying that ”
    Everyone at eHarmony shares my committment to your success.” As I have stated before juxapose that against their terms and conditon how they can terminate you “for any or no reason.” That is contradictory. Dr. Warren probably should have stay in marriage counseling. In my view he has lost credibility with this so called relationship corporation that has no ideal how to incorporate his values into a dating culture that is also valueless in my opinion.

    Posted 27 Jan 2010 at 8:11 am
  12. annoymous1 wrote:

    If Warren has been ushered out the door, it was probably to keep him from saying things like the above (which would have been great) if they weren’t contradicted in eHarmony” terms and conditions.”

    Posted 27 Jan 2010 at 8:27 am
  13. annoymous1 wrote:

    Actually the whole ideal of having this tests for compatilbility that leads to marriage in my book is a joke. A lot of men are like Jon, who wrote he had 7 month relationship withone strictly because she was hot. A lot of men are just looking for flings or a good time. They get on eHarmony because it is a dating site. And then don’t find glamour dolls and so they are not happy campers. In fairness some women are that way. People are looking for chemistry first, interests second( for men it seems to hunting, fishing and golfing,) and compatibility a distant third. There may be exceptions but I didn’t see them. I bought into that fantasy but it wasn’t there. The whole thing is insane.

    Posted 27 Jan 2010 at 11:07 am
  14. annoymous1 wrote:

    Most of the girls I met on there were pretty terrible, actually. They were husband shopping and if you weren’t looking for a wife they weren’t looking at you.

    One of eHarmony’s customer who passed muster?

    On the eHarmony’s web site it states. “Our-in-depth Personality Profile and rigorous matching system makes sure only sincere singles seeking long-term relationships are matched.”

    The whole thing is a farce. It is too bad more people don’t realize it.

    Posted 28 Jan 2010 at 10:49 am
  15. annoymous1 wrote:

    Here is a final juxaposition. j. You understand that the Company makes no guarantees, either express or implied, regarding your ultimate compatibility with individuals you meet through the Service.

    Again, they speak in dissonance voices which is in music terms the opposite of harmony.

    Posted 29 Jan 2010 at 9:01 am
  16. annomous1 wrote:

    I have another perspective on these personality tests. It just maybe that individuals who are more idealistic deep thinkers and maybe to a certain extent politically active may get depressed more so than individual who are hedonistic and live for the moment. Think about it. A lot of individuals do not even now who there representatives are. I will say people who are politically active may feel they are fighting the cause and maybe are not as depressed as those who do nothing. Although those who are politically active may feel depressed about losing a give race, bill or amendment change. I imagine if Health Care goes down there are going to be quite a few depressed Democrats. Individuals who really know the complexities of life may tend to get more depressed especially if they are idealistic. You learn there are no perfect instituions, individuals and we are finite human beings. If you hide you head in the sand and live strictly for the moment, fun, sex, eHarmony picks up on your upbeat personality and your in. And so it goes.

    Posted 31 Jan 2010 at 8:32 am
  17. snafuedbyeharmony wrote:

    Just curious, where did you get your statistics regarding refects (i.e. 1.6% of ppl were rejected for this reason)? I do find it annoying that you can go through the whole process and be rejected. I don’t think I fall into any category mentioned here, and I am a fairly moderate person… really wondered if it was a religious reason, considering I said I’m Christian, but don’t really give a hoot about religion. Then again, maybe I’m just not happy or shiny enough. A few pills and a few sessions, and I’ll be over this whole rejection thing in no time. F*** you, Eharmony :)

    Posted 16 Feb 2010 at 4:42 am
  18. annomous1 wrote:

    I do not know where they got their statistics. But, again I think the tests are flaws, a lot of matches who are in my hedonistics get in and some more thoughtful people get the boot. And again I think people who have depth maybe more likely to get depressed then people who just live for the moment. There maybe exceptions, but this is what I am picking up on.

    Posted 16 Feb 2010 at 5:20 am
  19. eharmonyblog wrote:

    Here is the link to the Washington Post article that is cited in the article and that has the statistics: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/12/AR2007051201350.html , dated 13 May 2007.

    It’s not 1.30% or 1.27%, if you would read the blog article carefully. Thanks for your question.

    Posted 16 Feb 2010 at 6:55 am
  20. annoymous1 wrote:

    Here is part of the aritcle. I don’t know about their statistics. But this shows their rational. For instance to quote them “Dysthmia actually referes to chronic but less severe form of depression.” Customers are actually rejected for that and read the rest. I guess some of us are not hedonistic enough.

    EHarmony also rejects anyone younger than 60 who’s been married more than four times, as well as those who fail its “dysthymia scale,” another proprietary metric designed to screen people who, the company says, might have “severe depression.” (Dysthymia actually refers to a chronic but less severe form of depression.)

    EHarmony’s gay and psychological screening methods have generated criticism for years among online daters, says David Evans, who writes the Online Dating Insider blog (and has consulted for several dating companies, including Chemistry.com). “You hear it all the time: People say, ‘I filled out this long questionnaire, and I got rejected for not being happy enough,’ ” Evans says. “You do this deep-think about your personality, and then it feels like you got smacked across the face.”

    EHarmony also rejects anyone younger than 60 who’s been married more than four times, as well as those who fail its “dysthymia scale,” another proprietary metric designed to screen people who, the company says, might have “severe depression.” (Dysthymia actually refers to a chronic but less severe form of depression.)

    EHarmony’s gay and psychological screening methods have generated criticism for years among online daters, says David Evans, who writes the Online Dating Insider blog (and has consulted for several dating companies, including Chemistry.com). “You hear it all the time: People say, ‘I filled out this long questionnaire, and I got rejected for not being happy enough,’ ” Evans says. “You do this deep-think about your personality, and then it feels like you got smacked across the face.”

    Posted 16 Feb 2010 at 7:08 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published, shown nor shared.

Your message appears after two to five seconds for the world to see. In case it isn’t obvious, we are not eHarmony. Your message will not be sent to them, and no, we cannot help you with your account.

Have your own topic? Start a new discussion. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting

Geo Visitors Map