Your question answered: Why eHarmony rejected you

A search for the phrase “eHarmony is based upon a complex matching system” (an excerpt of eHarmony’s rejection notice) in Technorati, a blog search engine, gives 50 hits in the last 45 days — This means that, once a day, someone is blogging that eH rejected them — that they flunked a personality test. At the same time, searching for “eHarmony reject” in Google gives 39,000 hits.

There really is something irksome about being promised “someone who will love you for who you are” and then getting a boilerplate rejection notice.

“Unable to match you at this time” — so what does this mean?

What irritates us about the boilerplate reason, which has been unchanged since 2000 when eH launched, is that it loves to be vague. We at eHarmony Blog hate vagueness, so, for you, we did some research.

Here is the most complete checklist of reasons why eHarmony rejected you:

Reason #1. You said you are separated or married on page 1. 30% of eHarmony rejects fall into this category, according to a May 2007 article in the Washington Post.

Reason #2. You said you are below 20 on page 1. 27% percent fall into this category.

Reason #3. You said you were married more than twice on page 1.1 “EHarmony also rejects anyone younger than 60 who’s been married more than four times,” according to the Washington Post article.

The cursed test still lets you go through all questions even if it knows on page 1 that it will reject you. And, look, it even has the irony to say, “If we find that we will not be able to match a user using these profiles, we feel it is only fair to inform them early in the process.”

Reason #4. Your answers don’t tally, i.e., (a) you clicked randomly or (b) for example, you put “1″ under Aloof on page 1, but checked “Outgoing” on page 6. 9% of rejects fall into this category.

Reason #5. You scored low on the following traits — eHarmony calls them dimensions:

  • Self-Concept (how you perceive yourself)
  • Emotional Status (feeling happy, fulfilled and hopeful)
  • Character (honesty and trustworthiness)
  • Obstreperousness (the black hole dimension)
  • Character (honesty and trustworthiness)2
  • Emotion Management: Anger (expressing negative emotions constructively)
  • Conflict Resolution (resolving issues).
  • Family Background (happy childhood and supportiveness of your parents)

If you remember, there are entire SECTIONS in the test exactly to ask if you have ill feelings in the last month, how you handle arguments and how good your relationship is with your parents. If a registrant just left an abusive relationship and she revealed her feelings in the test, well, instead of saying, “Sorry but you’re not emotionally ready to get married. We’d like to tell you what you need to work on, but we’re not your therapist,” eH rejects the registrant.

So what do I do next?

We want to tell you to open another yahoo or hotmail account today and retake the test, but we can’t. Instead we offer a gentle suggestion. May we suggest that you take a break first from seeking committed relationships. We mean, enjoy being single again (or for now).

[added after RG's comment below] Or we could be wrong. It’s possible that eHarmony is not for you. There’s nothing wrong with you; it’s just that the eH system was designed for a certain profile of people and match them for marriage — it isn’t ready for someone like you yet.

DO NOT read this as a judgement that there is no one out there for you. You know best what is best for you. DO NOT let the above generalisations discourage you from desiring and working towards a lifetime loving commitment with another person. If the above reasons do not apply, then we invite you to retake the test, now or after a few weeks or months. [/added]

Without sounding “holier than thou”, try this idea for size: If you’ve joined an matrimonial matchmaking site, would you want matches who are emotionally ready to be married? Would you like to be matched to someone who reveals psychological or emotional problems?

What do you think?

Check out our May 2007 poll: Do you agree with eHarmony rejecting people?

Do you like this article? Post a comment on Facebook

Trackbacks & Pingbacks 4

  1. From The 29 Dimensions of Bunk: Part 2 – A Skeptic was Rejected « Gotham Skeptic on 26 Mar 2010 at 4:06 am

    [...] for rejection are varied. A general list of such reasons include  testing low in self-concept, emotional status (happiness), character [...]

  2. From eHarmony failure - PriusChat Forums on 30 Jun 2010 at 8:57 am

    [...] Re: eHarmony failure eHarmony is famous for rejecting people (especially if you hint at being a little sad on the questionnaire). Only annoyingly-obliviously happy people need apply. For what it's worth, there are other reasons here: Your question answered: Why eHarmony rejected you • eHarmony Blog [...]

  3. From But you might soil yourself from all the excitement « Phantom Mattress on 11 Apr 2011 at 3:18 pm

    [...] in addition to discouraging gays and lesbians, atheists, depression sufferers and the divorced, eHarm also advises women that it’s possible to be too independent. You could be sabotaging [...]

  4. From “Guess what? I have flaws.” | She Sings at the Table on 14 Jun 2011 at 7:13 pm

    [...] on eHarmony and they told me I was un-matchable. (Really! Some follow-up googling revealed this interesting explanation. [...]

Comments 124

  1. John wrote:

    I feel as if I should also point out that Eharmony CEO ADMITS this:

    http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2005-05-18-eharmony_x.htm

    LOL What?! Are you kidding me? It sounds like if you can’t find someone who “can’t be pleased” why the hell are you bothering to offer the service?? People who go to these places have TROUBLE finding love! People who don’t normally go to bars or something..! My GOD.. I think this guy might be a troll..

    Posted 27 May 2009 at 12:24 pm
  2. SingleGuyInNC wrote:

    John,

    Based on your reply, you might want to read on here why you might be rejected and you will get some more insight into the process and psychological/relationship therapy that the site/process is based upon. NCW’s books also offer a lot of insight of what you should be thinking about when selecting a long-term mate and a lot of that information makes good sense if you are willing to be objective. Most of these fundamental issues about eH people are in an uproar about have been covered ad nauseam on this blog.

    Posted 27 May 2009 at 7:24 pm
  3. Shar wrote:

    “Shar, I’m not trying to put you down but there is seriously something wrong if it takes 2 or 3 years to see a problem in the other person’s core values. eharmony or any other dating site is not going to cure that situation, I’m afraid.”

    Jon,

    There is an old saying that “middle age is when your broad mind and narrow waist begin to change places”, and it’s true.

    Many people THINK they know what they want, but when push comes to shove, they change their minds or realize that what they think they wanted really isn’t what they wanted at all. There sometimes is no way to separate the wheat from the chafe in these situations. I’m a very good judge of character, and as such have ended up in very few unsavory relationships. EHarmony does a pretty good job of approaching values from all sides so that people who are on the fence don’t waste other peoples time (or money).

    It’s not unusual for people to come to a realization that what they believed to be true about themselves is not true at all. Or a life experience can reveal their true calling. It’s part of growing.

    BTW, I just celebrated my 3 month wedding aniversary! And I met him on my way home from an Eharmony date that didn’t work out!

    Posted 11 Jul 2009 at 3:01 pm
  4. Jarred wrote:

    Reject as of about 15 minutes ago. I didn’t put anything contradictory, I put that I’m interested in marriage and put nothing to do with depression…
    I did however put no interest or little interest in the various religious based questions. Hmmm.. :)

    Posted 12 Jul 2009 at 7:41 am
  5. Tom wrote:

    Jarred, I put no interest in religious based questions and had no issues, so that isn’t the issue.

    Posted 12 Jul 2009 at 2:25 pm
  6. julie wrote:

    Most of the population in the United States is taking some kind of antidepressant medication. So as much as people like to believe that emotional problems are a reason to stay away from someone, good luck with that. I am most worried about people who are pretending to be fine, not the ones who are honest about it. I knew someone, dated someone, who was on eharmony and was actively pursuing women on eharmony and I quickly got away from him. He was not rejected. He was angry and emotionally abusive leading toward physical abuse. They did not turn him away from eharmony, why, because he lied on his profile. I think it would be better to reward the honesty of people who admit to emotional struggles rather than make them feel more isolated by rejecting them. But the right wing christians aren’t known for being that caring, for real.

    Posted 14 Jul 2009 at 1:37 pm
  7. Honestly wrote:

    Reward them with what, Julie? Aha I know… they ought to match these honest wackos up with you.

    Posted 15 Jul 2009 at 1:36 pm
  8. RG wrote:

    The simple fact is that this is a bigoted and un-American company. As I understand it, they have rejected over a million of us., so that is my experience with them. Someone really should start a class action suit against them for at least $30 million. I know I spent nearly an hour answering highly person questions after they assured me this was “a thirty dollar value”. I certainly think they owe me thirty bucks, and they should pay that to everyone they have insulted with this false advertising.

    They certainly also owe Julie an apology – and everyone else in her boat they screened out for their honesty. I think she would be fully within her rights to file a suit against them if she experienced even a few days of anguish from their declaration that she is “not fit for a relationship”.

    Someone above said I was “bitter” and likened me to someone who was rejected in a bar and now I wanted to attack that bar. It is not like that at all. It is more like if the bar had a “customer screening” profile, that only people with certain skin colors were allowed to enter, or only people with certain Religious beliefs. Public corporations, or even private businesses are not allowed to do this in America. Several years back, Denny’s Corporation was accused of having a customer business profile that was racist. They have reportedly more than corrected this since then, but an the time they had to pay a huge amount of cash and make up for what they had done.

    What eHarmony has done is worse, in my opinion, the fact that they have excluded more than a million Americans from their service means they are one of the most bigoted companies in American history – yet strangely off the radar screen.

    I am positive the “algorithm” they use to match their customers has a right-wing Christian bias. I am not married, nor am I gay so I can only guess I was rejected because they belied I made contradictory statements. According to eHarmony, they reject applicants who’s answers reveal “flags” about their mental health, or who have contradictory answers that they consider to be “dishonest”. This is the classic right wing thinking of “attacking from strength” that we all are familiar with now. The people they are attacking as dishonest, are actually the honest ones; and they can’t even see their own massive amount of dishonesty, because they are immersed in it.

    I personally answered their profile carefully and honestly (and I would put my honesty up against those people ANY DAY). What eHarmony considers to be dishonest “because it is contradictory”, could be very different for a person who does not have right wing Christian values. Can a person be both shy and outgoing? Can a person be both fearful and courageous? I think they can, but In the narrow minded world of Neil Clark Warren, the evangelical Christian founder and inventor of this terrible service, this – and many other things, mean that you are “not mentally healthy”.

    Think for a minute of what this company is doing. They first trick you into filling out a highly detailed, immensely personal questionnaire, store that in their files, subject it to some it with some secret evaluation process, then reject you as a person “unsuitable” for a relationship, or in the words of Neil Clark Warren, a person who is not, “emotionally healthy”. If this happened to you, as it did to me, you were essentially defrauded. The eHarmony company conned you into registering for their system under false pretenses, then they don’t even tell you why. Maybe you were rejected because “no Atheists are allowed” or maybe they don’t like you because people with your value system tend to be “pro-choice” – or maybe think you have “socialist tendencies” or something like that.

    The “culture of dishonesty” started by Neil Clark Warren lives on at eHarmony. You can see it at newer deceptive advertising campaigns like, “it is free to look”, or the ridiculous “free communication weekend”. I recently was reviewing some affiliate banner advertising programs and was stunned when I saw the average payout from eHarmony. I’m not going to say the number, but they collect a TON of money over time from each member. Don’t think for a minute they really want those people in relationships – that is (literally) the last thing they want.

    Even if they are able to get through eHarmony’s right wing screening process, ask your friends not to support this company, any more then they would support any organization that denies services to anyone based on race, ethnicity, religion or political beliefs.

    RG

    Posted 15 Jul 2009 at 3:36 pm
  9. Relatos Gay wrote:

    Or perhaps they rejected you because their system is not as complete and good as they want make it out to be?
    Or maybe you are gay and the creator/founder of eharmony thinks that’s a wrong lifestyle and doesn’t want to endorse it (my interpretation from his answers to an interview).

    Posted 18 Jul 2009 at 2:51 am
  10. Austin wrote:

    Well after being rejected by eHarmony after filling out the questionnaire twice, I decided to become a statistic in the google fact mentioned above. At first I was appalled considering the false advertisment, but I was even more appalled at their lack of supposed dating services for atheist’s. After some consideration I decided to get some more evidence of this strictly for myself, but I would be glad to share my results. I went through the questionnaire and wrote down every single choice I made, this time answering honestly about my religious choices. Then I went through the questionnaire answering the exact same for every question other than those pertaining to religion in which case I put christianity. The results? I got rejected on my atheist questionnaire and accepted on my christianity one. The even more suprising thing, is that on my christianity profile I didn’t even end up with any matches, even though it actually created the profile! Their supposed reason for rejecting me the first time! So for any of you wondering if you were rejected simply because of your beliefs, you can now be comforted that there is nothing wrong with what you or what you believe its just that some people still aren’t comfortable with what your beliefs and are willing to deny you service because of it.

    Posted 29 Jul 2009 at 8:45 am
  11. Rob wrote:

    Relatos – As I said in my post, I am not gay. I do think that lawsuit where they were required to build a gay site was an absolutely ridiculous ruling. That would be the equivalent of someone who was found to be running a restaurant that didn’t allow blacks to be required to build a “blacks only restaurant. “Separate but equal” was rejected by our society long ago.

    Posted 29 Jul 2009 at 12:59 pm
  12. Rob wrote:

    Austin – all I can say is wow – what an excellent expose’. The eHarmony site is obviously run by small minded bigots. It is the modern equivalent of the “no blacks allowed” lunch counters. You have now proved definitively that this site is bigoted against non-believers. Your investigative journalism deserves much more attention than will get here. I would encourage you to write this up in more detail and post it where more people might see it. Good job!

    Posted 29 Jul 2009 at 1:03 pm
  13. Jon S. wrote:

    Eharmony should do more filtering. None of us wants to end up married to a lunatic! :-) Businesses have the right to refuse service, as is the same with a dating website. If you guys think Eharmony is hard to get on, try getting into one of these “date millionare websites. You have to verify the your accounts. Then you’ll have gold diggers chasing you, not bad if your just looking for some fun. My best advice to you all, is be careful dating people on the net. This is where the freaks seem to congrgate. But there are some single, nice, normal people on here. So take your choice.

    Posted 27 Nov 2009 at 7:36 pm
  14. Peter wrote:

    I don’t have a problem with beng rejected by eHarmony. Hell, after reading all the problems people have with that site I’m glad of it. I do take issue though with not being able to remove my account and information. I have contacted them about it and get what looks to be a form letter style reply which contains useless incorrect information.

    Login -> my settings -> account settings -> close account

    I can do nothing after logging in except read a screen which states in big letters “Unable To Match You At This Time”. Not possible to access anything and any attempt to reply to their help email is met with an email bounce by the Gmail sever (their end as I am sending from Yahoo).

    Posted 18 Jan 2010 at 11:29 am
  15. JB wrote:

    I bet if I lied about my income, there would’ve been some matches. The one in five that don’t “match up” with others–the reason I tried the site was to find someone similar. We should have a site called eharmonyrejects.com and match ourselves up.

    Posted 22 Jan 2010 at 4:08 pm
  16. Scottk wrote:

    JB,
    Oh, I don’t think income has anything to do with it.

    As long as you can afford a subscription, EHarmony is not
    going to reject you based on what you make.

    Perhaps your victim mentality based on your income is what they have picked up in your answers, and rejected you based on that?

    Posted 22 Jan 2010 at 5:00 pm
  17. Rob wrote:

    What a rude thing to say Scottk – that JB has a “victim” mentality – I didn’t pick that up at all from his post. How do you know they don’t select out because of income? Do you know the algorithm they use? It has already been proven on this thread that they select out non-believers. eHarmony makes hundreds of dollars of each user – they don’t want you to be matched because they would lose money – it seems quite possible that they also don’t like people without lots of money. The site was designed by a small minded bigot – people should not give this company their money.

    Posted 22 Jan 2010 at 5:18 pm
  18. Scottk wrote:

    Rob,

    I personally know of at least 2 atheists that are currently members on EHarmony.
    They all answered the questions about religion stating they they are not religious at all, and do NOT want to get matched up with people that are religious.
    Yet, both are active members, and get plenty of matches that feel the same way as they do about religion.

    As for JB, I have been matched up with plenty of women that do not make much money, if any.
    I have had gotten matched up waitresses, stay-at-home mothers, and fast food workers.

    How do those facts work into your conspiracy theory about EHarmony?

    Posted 23 Jan 2010 at 10:21 am
  19. Rob wrote:

    Conspiracy theory? Read more of the posts here. “Not religious” is very different from being atheists. Those people likely answered at least some of the questions in a way that would satisfy a Christian algorithm. A member here submitted two profiles – identical except that one answered every question about religion to indicate a non-belief in god – and that one was rejected. That is about as scientific as you can get. Someone should sue their asses off – these are small minded bigots.

    eHarmony also does a great job of screening out honest people – the people who tell the truth on that “profile” get rejected – the liars are accepted. Maybe that is why some many women say the guys on eHarmony are total losers. In any event, this could easily be proven one way or another. All eHarmony has to do is publish the algorithm created by Neil Clark Warren to make happy Christian marriages and then we could see for ourselves.

    Posted 23 Jan 2010 at 3:02 pm
  20. Scottk wrote:

    Rob,

    Why are you so bitter?
    There is someone out to get you around every corner, rgiht?
    You must be such a very pleasant person to be around!

    Why don’t you join a different site?

    Chemistry.com is a dating site that purposely goes after the demographic you appear to be in.
    Heck, they have even run ads with the “Rejected” EHarmony tag, and welcomes those rejected members with open arms!

    Why would they publish their algorithm?
    That is their proprietary “secret sauce”.

    Do you also demand that Coke publish their recipe?

    Would you sue Harvard because you didn’t get admitted?

    BTW,
    I know of 1 person that absolutely, positively, stated he was an Atheist when he joined, and answered every religion question that came up with that same answer.

    He did not get rejected.
    How could that possibly happen in your world?

    Perhaps he didn’t rejected because EHarmony could tell by his answers that he did not have a chip on his shoulder, looking for any reason to call foul, wanting to sue because he didn’t get his way?

    Those are the people EHarmony does not want, because they do not make good relationship partners.

    The fact that you are so bitter, even now, after what, months? years? after being rejected by a lousy freaking dating site, says mountains about your state of mind and being.

    Let it go man, and move onto other things.
    Good luck, you most definitely need it.

    Posted 23 Jan 2010 at 10:06 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published, shown nor shared.

Your message appears after two to five seconds for the world to see. In case it isn’t obvious, we are not eHarmony. Your message will not be sent to them, and no, we cannot help you with your account.

Have your own topic? Start a new discussion. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting

Geo Visitors Map